Transport Clustering: Solving Low-Rank Optimal Transport via Clustering

ICLR 2026 Conference SubmissionAnonymous Authors
optimal transportlow rankapproximation algorithmsk-meansco-clusteringclustering
Abstract:

Optimal transport (OT) finds a least cost transport plan between two probability distributions using a cost matrix over pairs of points. Constraining the rank of the transport plan yields low-rank OT, which improves statistical stability and interpretability compared to full-rank OT. Further, low-rank OT naturally induces co-clusters between distributions and generalizes KK-means clustering. Reversing this direction, we show that solving a clustering problem on a set of correspondences, termed transport clustering, solves low-rank OT. This connection between low-rank OT and transport clustering relies on a transport registration of the cost matrix which registers the cost matrix via the transport map. We show that the reduction of low-rank OT to transport clustering yields polynomial-time, constant-factor approximation algorithms for low-rank OT. Specifically, we show that for the low-rank OT problem this reduction yields a (1+γ)(1+\gamma)-approximation algorithm for metrics of negative-type and a (1+γ+2γ)(1+\gamma+\sqrt{2\gamma}\,)-approximation algorithm for kernel costs where γ[0,1]\gamma \in [0,1] denotes the approximation ratio to the optimal full-rank solution. We demonstrate that transport clustering outperforms existing low-rank OT methods on several synthetic benchmarks and large-scale, high-dimensional real datasets.

Disclaimer
This report is AI-GENERATED using Large Language Models and WisPaper (A scholar search engine). It analyzes academic papers' tasks and contributions against retrieved prior work. While this system identifies POTENTIAL overlaps and novel directions, ITS COVERAGE IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND JUDGMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE. These results are intended to assist human reviewers and SHOULD NOT be relied upon as a definitive verdict on novelty.
NOTE that some papers exist in multiple, slightly different versions (e.g., with different titles or URLs). The system may retrieve several versions of the same underlying work. The current automated pipeline does not reliably align or distinguish these cases, so human reviewers will need to disambiguate them manually.
If you have any questions, please contact: mingzhang23@m.fudan.edu.cn

Overview

Overall Novelty Assessment

The paper establishes a reduction from low-rank optimal transport to a clustering problem on correspondences, termed transport clustering, via a novel transport registration of the cost matrix. This work resides in the 'Clustering and Unsupervised Learning' leaf of the taxonomy, which contains only three papers total including the original. This is a relatively sparse research direction within the broader low-rank OT landscape, suggesting the specific connection between low-rank OT and clustering via transport registration represents a less-explored angle compared to more crowded areas like low-rank factorization algorithms or domain adaptation applications.

The taxonomy reveals that neighboring leaves focus on domain adaptation and transfer learning, attention mechanisms for neural architectures, and generative modeling with uncertainty quantification. The paper's clustering focus diverges from these supervised or neural-architecture-oriented directions, instead connecting to theoretical branches on approximation algorithms and complexity. The scope notes indicate clear boundaries: this work addresses unsupervised clustering rather than supervised domain adaptation, and emphasizes algorithmic guarantees rather than neural integration. The broader 'Applications of Low-Rank OT in Machine Learning' branch shows substantial activity across multiple application domains, but the clustering-specific angle remains comparatively underexplored.

Among the three contributions analyzed, the literature search examined twenty candidate papers total. The core reduction to transport clustering (Contribution 1) was not directly examined against prior work in the available data. For the polynomial-time approximation algorithms (Contribution 2) and the transport clustering algorithm itself (Contribution 3), ten candidates each were examined with zero refutable pairs identified in either case. This suggests that among the limited set of semantically similar papers retrieved, none provided clear overlapping prior work on these specific algorithmic contributions. The search scope of twenty papers represents a focused but not exhaustive examination of the literature.

Based on the limited search scope of twenty semantically matched candidates, the work appears to occupy a relatively novel position connecting low-rank OT theory to clustering algorithms. The sparse population of the taxonomy leaf and absence of refutable prior work among examined candidates suggest the transport registration approach and resulting approximation guarantees represent fresh contributions. However, this assessment is constrained by the top-K semantic search methodology and does not constitute an exhaustive literature review across all possible related work in optimization, clustering theory, or approximation algorithms.

Taxonomy

Core-task Taxonomy Papers
50
3
Claimed Contributions
20
Contribution Candidate Papers Compared
0
Refutable Paper

Research Landscape Overview

Core task: low-rank optimal transport. The field of low-rank optimal transport has grown into a rich landscape organized around several complementary themes. At the highest level, one finds branches dedicated to low-rank factorization methods for entropic OT (e.g., Low-rank Sinkhorn[3]), low-rank approximations of cost and kernel matrices, and unbalanced or robust variants (Unbalanced Solvers[4], Subspace Robust[10]) that handle outliers or mass discrepancies. Parallel branches address quadratic and Gromov-Wasserstein problems (Linear-time Gromov[9]), computational frameworks and software (OTT JAX[7]), and a diverse set of machine learning applications ranging from clustering and unsupervised learning to domain adaptation (Robust Domain Adaptation[1]) and generative modeling (Generative Modeling[35]). Additional branches cover theoretical foundations, statistical inference, domain-specific uses (e.g., color transfer, infrared tracking), and connections to broader low-rank methods in optimization and matrix factorization. Within this ecosystem, a particularly active line of work explores regularization strategies that enforce or exploit low-rank structure, including Schatten-norm penalties (Schatten Regularization[5], Schatten-p Regularization[15]) and hierarchical or multiscale refinements (Hierarchical Refinement[2], Hierarchical Wasserstein[48]). Transport Clustering[0] sits naturally in the clustering and unsupervised learning branch, leveraging low-rank transport plans to group data in a computationally efficient manner. Its emphasis on clustering contrasts with nearby works such as Tree-Wasserstein[33] and Graph Convolutional[34], which focus on structured or graph-based representations, and complements methods like Hierarchical Dissimilarity[8] that build hierarchical partitions. Overall, Transport Clustering[0] exemplifies how low-rank constraints can be harnessed to scale unsupervised learning tasks, bridging algorithmic efficiency with interpretable groupings in high-dimensional settings.

Claimed Contributions

Reduction of low-rank optimal transport to transport clustering via transport registration

The authors introduce transport clustering, which reduces the low-rank optimal transport problem from a co-clustering problem to a generalized K-means clustering problem. This reduction is achieved through transport registration of the cost matrix, where the cost matrix is registered using the optimal full-rank transport plan.

0 retrieved papers
Polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for low-rank optimal transport

The authors prove that their transport clustering approach provides polynomial-time approximation algorithms with constant-factor guarantees for low-rank optimal transport. For negative-type metrics, they achieve a (1 + γ)-approximation, and for kernel costs, they achieve a (1 + γ + √2γ)-approximation, where γ represents the ratio between optimal rank K and full-rank OT costs.

10 retrieved papers
Transport Clustering algorithm with theoretical guarantees and practical effectiveness

The authors develop Transport Clustering as a practical algorithm that inherits algorithmic stability and approximation guarantees from modern K-means solvers. The method demonstrates superior performance compared to existing low-rank OT methods on both synthetic benchmarks and large-scale real datasets.

10 retrieved papers

Core Task Comparisons

Comparisons with papers in the same taxonomy category

Contribution Analysis

Detailed comparisons for each claimed contribution

Contribution

Reduction of low-rank optimal transport to transport clustering via transport registration

The authors introduce transport clustering, which reduces the low-rank optimal transport problem from a co-clustering problem to a generalized K-means clustering problem. This reduction is achieved through transport registration of the cost matrix, where the cost matrix is registered using the optimal full-rank transport plan.

Contribution

Polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for low-rank optimal transport

The authors prove that their transport clustering approach provides polynomial-time approximation algorithms with constant-factor guarantees for low-rank optimal transport. For negative-type metrics, they achieve a (1 + γ)-approximation, and for kernel costs, they achieve a (1 + γ + √2γ)-approximation, where γ represents the ratio between optimal rank K and full-rank OT costs.

Contribution

Transport Clustering algorithm with theoretical guarantees and practical effectiveness

The authors develop Transport Clustering as a practical algorithm that inherits algorithmic stability and approximation guarantees from modern K-means solvers. The method demonstrates superior performance compared to existing low-rank OT methods on both synthetic benchmarks and large-scale real datasets.

Transport Clustering: Solving Low-Rank Optimal Transport via Clustering | Novelty Validation