To Infinity and Beyond: Tool-Use Unlocks Length Generalization in State Space Models

ICLR 2026 Conference SubmissionAnonymous Authors
State Space ModelsMambaLength GeneralizationLLMTransformers
Abstract:

State Space Models (SSMs) have become the leading alternative to Transformers for sequence modeling tasks. Their primary advantage is efficiency in long-context and long-form generation, enabled by fixed-size memory and linear scaling of computational complexity. We begin this work by showing a simple theoretical result stating that SSMs cannot accurately solve any long-form generation problem, undermining their main competitive advantage. However, we show that this limitation can be mitigated by allowing SSMs interactive access to external tools. In fact, we show that given the right choice of tool access and problem-dependent training data, SSMs can learn to solve any tractable problem and generalize to arbitrary problem length/complexity (i.e., achieve length generalization). Following our theoretical finding, we demonstrate that tool-augmented SSMs achieve remarkable length generalization on a variety of arithmetic, reasoning, and coding tasks. These findings highlight SSMs as a potential efficient alternative to Transformers in interactive tool-based and agentic settings.

Disclaimer
This report is AI-GENERATED using Large Language Models and WisPaper (A scholar search engine). It analyzes academic papers' tasks and contributions against retrieved prior work. While this system identifies POTENTIAL overlaps and novel directions, ITS COVERAGE IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND JUDGMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE. These results are intended to assist human reviewers and SHOULD NOT be relied upon as a definitive verdict on novelty.
NOTE that some papers exist in multiple, slightly different versions (e.g., with different titles or URLs). The system may retrieve several versions of the same underlying work. The current automated pipeline does not reliably align or distinguish these cases, so human reviewers will need to disambiguate them manually.
If you have any questions, please contact: mingzhang23@m.fudan.edu.cn

Overview

Overall Novelty Assessment

The paper contributes a theoretical characterization of SSMs' limitations on long-form generation and proposes tool augmentation as a remedy, alongside empirical validation across arithmetic, reasoning, and coding tasks. Within the taxonomy, it resides in the Tool-Use Learning and Generalization leaf under Tool-Augmented Reasoning and Agent Systems. This leaf contains only two papers total, indicating a relatively sparse research direction. The broader Tool-Augmented Reasoning branch encompasses four leaves with thirteen papers across the entire taxonomy, suggesting this intersection of SSMs and tool-use is an emerging rather than saturated area.

The taxonomy reveals neighboring work in Tool-Use Inference Optimization (focused on error handling and syntax validation) and Multimodal Tool-Augmented Systems (cross-modal reasoning), while the SSM Architecture and Design branch addresses core architectural innovations without tool integration. The paper bridges these domains by examining how SSMs' fixed-size memory interacts with external tool access. The scope note for Tool-Use Learning and Generalization explicitly excludes pure architectural improvements and theoretical analyses, positioning this work at the boundary between theoretical foundations and practical tool-use frameworks, distinct from purely empirical tool-learning studies.

Among thirty candidates examined, none clearly refute any of the three contributions. The theoretical limitation claim (ten candidates, zero refutable) and the tool-augmented generalization framework (ten candidates, zero refutable) both show no substantial prior overlap within the search scope. The empirical demonstration (ten candidates, zero refutable) similarly lacks direct precedent among examined papers. This absence of refutation across all contributions suggests the specific combination of SSM theoretical analysis and tool-based length generalization has limited prior coverage, though the modest search scale means unexplored literature may exist beyond these thirty candidates.

Based on the limited search scope of thirty semantically similar papers, the work appears to occupy a novel position combining SSM theory with tool-augmented reasoning. The sparse population of its taxonomy leaf and absence of refuting candidates within the examined set suggest originality, though the analysis cannot rule out relevant work outside the top-thirty semantic matches or in adjacent research communities not captured by this taxonomy structure.

Taxonomy

Core-task Taxonomy Papers
13
3
Claimed Contributions
30
Contribution Candidate Papers Compared
0
Refutable Paper

Research Landscape Overview

Core task: length generalization in state space models with tool use. This emerging research area sits at the intersection of two major themes: developing efficient state space model (SSM) architectures that can handle long sequences, and enabling models to leverage external tools for complex reasoning. The taxonomy reflects three main branches. The first, Tool-Augmented Reasoning and Agent Systems, encompasses works that explore how models learn to invoke tools, reason with external resources, and generalize tool-use patterns to novel contexts—ranging from synthetic environments like Synthetic CodeGym Tool-Use[6] to multimodal settings such as Multimodal Tool-Augmented Video[4]. The second branch, SSM Architecture and Design, focuses on core architectural innovations—from foundational designs like Simplified State Space Layers[2] and Pretraining Without Attention[7] to hybrid approaches such as Zamba Compact Hybrid[13]—that aim to scale SSMs efficiently while preserving or improving their ability to capture long-range dependencies. The third branch, SSM Applications to Specialized Domains, examines how SSMs are adapted to specific problem settings, including vision-based locomotion in LocoMamba Vision Locomotion[10], graph-structured data in State Space Models Graphs[9], and physics-informed modeling in Physics-Enhanced State Space[3]. A particularly active line of work investigates whether SSMs can match or exceed transformer performance on long-context tasks, as explored in SSM Long Context Performance[5], while another strand examines the interplay between architectural inductive biases and generalization, highlighted by Inductive Bias State Space[11]. Tool-Use Length Generalization[0] sits squarely within the Tool-Use Learning and Generalization cluster, addressing how models can extend tool-based reasoning beyond training-length sequences. This work contrasts with purely architectural studies like Simplified State Space Layers[2] by emphasizing the compositional challenge of tool invocation over extended horizons, and complements efforts such as Synthetic CodeGym Tool-Use[6] by focusing on length extrapolation rather than tool-use diversity alone. The central open question is whether SSMs' linear-time complexity and structured state representations offer advantages for generalizing tool-augmented reasoning to longer sequences compared to attention-based alternatives.

Claimed Contributions

Theoretical limitation of SSMs on long-form generation without tools

The authors prove that State Space Models with fixed memory cannot solve long-form generation tasks (where output length grows with problem complexity) when operating without interactive tool access, even when allowed to generate arbitrarily long chain-of-thought reasoning.

10 retrieved papers
Theoretical framework showing tool-augmented SSMs achieve length generalization

The authors introduce a theoretical framework for ReAct agents and prove that SSMs with interactive access to external memory tools can achieve perfect length generalization on any computationally tractable long-form generation task, given appropriate training trajectories.

10 retrieved papers
Empirical demonstration of length generalization via interactive tool-use

The authors experimentally validate their theory by showing that SSMs trained on interactive tool-use trajectories extrapolate to problems orders of magnitude larger than training examples across arithmetic (e.g., 5-digit to 1,000-digit addition), logical reasoning, and coding tasks.

10 retrieved papers

Core Task Comparisons

Comparisons with papers in the same taxonomy category

Contribution Analysis

Detailed comparisons for each claimed contribution

Contribution

Theoretical limitation of SSMs on long-form generation without tools

The authors prove that State Space Models with fixed memory cannot solve long-form generation tasks (where output length grows with problem complexity) when operating without interactive tool access, even when allowed to generate arbitrarily long chain-of-thought reasoning.

Contribution

Theoretical framework showing tool-augmented SSMs achieve length generalization

The authors introduce a theoretical framework for ReAct agents and prove that SSMs with interactive access to external memory tools can achieve perfect length generalization on any computationally tractable long-form generation task, given appropriate training trajectories.

Contribution

Empirical demonstration of length generalization via interactive tool-use

The authors experimentally validate their theory by showing that SSMs trained on interactive tool-use trajectories extrapolate to problems orders of magnitude larger than training examples across arithmetic (e.g., 5-digit to 1,000-digit addition), logical reasoning, and coding tasks.

To Infinity and Beyond: Tool-Use Unlocks Length Generalization in State Space Models | Novelty Validation