Rethinking Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: A Principled Single-Sequence Measure

ICLR 2026 Conference SubmissionAnonymous Authors
llmnlguncertainty estimationuncertainty measuressingle-sequence measures
Abstract:

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in real-world applications, driving the need to evaluate the trustworthiness of their generated text. To this end, reliable uncertainty estimation is essential. Leading uncertainty estimation methods generate and analyze multiple output sequences, which is computationally expensive and impractical at scale. In this work, we inspect the theoretical foundations of these methods and explore new directions to enhance computational efficiency. Building on the framework of proper scoring rules, we find that the negative log-likelihood of the most likely output sequence constitutes a theoretically principled uncertainty measure. To approximate this alternative measure, we propose G-NLL, obtained using a single output sequence from greedy decoding. This approach streamlines uncertainty estimation while preserving theoretical rigor. Empirical results demonstrate that G-NLL achieves state-of-the-art performance across various scenarios. Our work lays the theoretical foundation for efficient and reliable uncertainty estimation in natural language generation, challenging the necessity of the prevalent methods that are more complex and resource-intensive.

Disclaimer
This report is AI-GENERATED using Large Language Models and WisPaper (A scholar search engine). It analyzes academic papers' tasks and contributions against retrieved prior work. While this system identifies POTENTIAL overlaps and novel directions, ITS COVERAGE IS NOT EXHAUSTIVE AND JUDGMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE. These results are intended to assist human reviewers and SHOULD NOT be relied upon as a definitive verdict on novelty.
NOTE that some papers exist in multiple, slightly different versions (e.g., with different titles or URLs). The system may retrieve several versions of the same underlying work. The current automated pipeline does not reliably align or distinguish these cases, so human reviewers will need to disambiguate them manually.
If you have any questions, please contact: mingzhang23@m.fudan.edu.cn

Overview

Overall Novelty Assessment

The paper proposes a theoretically grounded uncertainty measure based on the negative log-likelihood of the most likely output sequence, approximated via greedy decoding (G-NLL). It resides in the 'Bayesian and Decision-Theoretic Foundations' leaf, which contains only three papers total, indicating a relatively sparse research direction focused on formal theoretical principles rather than method proliferation. This positioning suggests the work contributes foundational theory to a less crowded area, contrasting with the densely populated 'Sampling-Based and Consistency Methods' branch where multiple semantic diversity and clustering approaches compete.

The taxonomy reveals neighboring leaves addressing semantic invariance and linguistic principles, while sibling papers in the same leaf include 'Subjective Uncertainty Quantification' and 'Uncertainty in NLP' surveys. The broader 'Uncertainty Estimation Methods' branch encompasses diverse techniques—semantic clustering, token-level density, and ensemble strategies—that prioritize computational complexity over theoretical parsimony. The paper's decision-theoretic framing via proper scoring rules diverges from these empirical approaches, instead connecting to calibration literature and single-sequence methods that avoid multi-sample overhead, bridging theoretical foundations with practical efficiency concerns.

Among twenty-seven candidates examined, the contribution-level analysis shows mixed novelty signals. The theoretical derivation of MSP as a principled measure examined ten candidates with one refutable match, suggesting some prior theoretical work exists in this space. The comparative analysis of MSP versus existing measures found no refutations across seven candidates, indicating this angle may be less explored. The G-NLL approximation method also encountered one refutation among ten candidates. These statistics reflect a limited search scope—top-K semantic matches plus citations—not an exhaustive literature review, so unexamined work may exist.

Given the constrained search scale and the paper's placement in a sparse theoretical leaf, the work appears to offer a distinct perspective grounded in proper scoring rules, an angle less emphasized in the sampling-dominated landscape. However, the presence of refutable candidates for two contributions suggests overlapping ideas exist, and the limited scope means the full extent of prior theoretical work on single-sequence measures remains uncertain. The analysis captures positioning within examined literature but cannot definitively assess novelty beyond these twenty-seven candidates.

Taxonomy

Core-task Taxonomy Papers
50
3
Claimed Contributions
27
Contribution Candidate Papers Compared
2
Refutable Paper

Research Landscape Overview

Core task: uncertainty estimation in natural language generation. The field has matured into a structured landscape with several major branches. Theoretical Foundations and Frameworks establish the conceptual underpinnings, including Bayesian and decision-theoretic perspectives that formalize what uncertainty means in generative settings. Uncertainty Estimation Methods form a dense branch encompassing diverse techniques—from semantic clustering approaches like Semantic Uncertainty[2] to token-level density methods and ensemble-based strategies. Calibration and Confidence Alignment address the critical challenge of ensuring that model-reported confidence scores align with actual correctness, explored in works such as Linguistic Calibration[39] and Rank-Calibration[44]. Domain-Specific Applications and Adaptations tailor these methods to particular tasks like summarization, question answering, or knowledge graphs, while Evaluation, Benchmarking, and Tooling provide standardized frameworks like LM-Polygraph[25] and CLUE[28] for comparing approaches. Survey and Review Papers, including LLM Uncertainty Survey[7] and UQ Taxonomy Survey[37], synthesize the rapidly growing literature. Recent work reveals contrasting philosophies and open questions. Some lines emphasize sampling-based diversity to capture semantic variability, as in Semantically Diverse Generation[3] and Diverse Generation Uncertainty[35], while others pursue single-forward-pass efficiency or leverage internal model states. A key tension involves whether to rely on model probabilities directly, as argued in Probabilities Are Enough[43], versus constructing higher-level semantic measures. Single-Sequence Uncertainty[0] sits within the Bayesian and Decision-Theoretic Foundations branch, sharing conceptual grounding with Subjective Uncertainty Quantification[5] and Uncertainty in NLP[6]. Where neighboring works like Subjective Uncertainty Quantification[5] focus on formalizing subjective belief structures and Uncertainty in NLP[6] surveys broader NLP uncertainty challenges, Single-Sequence Uncertainty[0] appears to emphasize principled frameworks for quantifying uncertainty from individual generated sequences, contributing foundational theory that complements the diverse estimation methods emerging across the taxonomy.

Claimed Contributions

Theoretical derivation of MSP as principled uncertainty measure

The authors extend proper scoring rules to natural language generation and derive the maximum sequence probability (MSP) as a theoretically grounded uncertainty measure by applying the zero-one score instead of the commonly used logarithmic score. This provides the first theoretical justification for MSP in NLG.

10 retrieved papers
Can Refute
Theoretical analysis comparing MSP and existing measures

The authors analyze sample-complexity bounds showing that approximating the MSP is more favorable than approximating entropy-based measures for typical LLM output distributions, demonstrating theoretical advantages of the single-sequence approach.

7 retrieved papers
G-NLL approximation method

The authors introduce G-NLL, which approximates the MSP using greedy decoding with a single output sequence. This method eliminates the need for sampling multiple sequences while maintaining theoretical rigor and achieving superior empirical performance.

10 retrieved papers
Can Refute

Core Task Comparisons

Comparisons with papers in the same taxonomy category

Contribution Analysis

Detailed comparisons for each claimed contribution

Contribution

Theoretical derivation of MSP as principled uncertainty measure

The authors extend proper scoring rules to natural language generation and derive the maximum sequence probability (MSP) as a theoretically grounded uncertainty measure by applying the zero-one score instead of the commonly used logarithmic score. This provides the first theoretical justification for MSP in NLG.

Contribution

Theoretical analysis comparing MSP and existing measures

The authors analyze sample-complexity bounds showing that approximating the MSP is more favorable than approximating entropy-based measures for typical LLM output distributions, demonstrating theoretical advantages of the single-sequence approach.

Contribution

G-NLL approximation method

The authors introduce G-NLL, which approximates the MSP using greedy decoding with a single output sequence. This method eliminates the need for sampling multiple sequences while maintaining theoretical rigor and achieving superior empirical performance.